Enterprise adoption
Hosted vs. self-managed deployment
Understand operational burden, data controls, governance, and procurement trade-offs.
Vendor-hosted deploymentDeployment model
Self-managed deploymentDeployment model
Questions this comparison will answer
- Which operational responsibilities move to the vendor, and which stay with you?
- What data leaves your boundary, and what does the vendor retain?
- How do updates, incident response, and audit evidence differ?
- How does each affect procurement and authorization requirements?
Who it is for
- Enterprise architects
- Security and procurement teams
- Public-sector buyers
Dimensions
- Operational burden
- Data control
- Governance and audit
- Procurement fit
Test conditions
Not yet defined
Test conditions (tasks, versions, settings, number of runs, and pass criteria) are published before results. None exist yet, so none of the differences below can be documented.
Documented differences
None documented
Differences are listed here only when each is supported by a linked evidence record.
Conclusion
No conclusion yet
A conclusion is added only when the evidence supports it. Until then, this page makes no claim about which option is better.
Limitations
- This is a conceptual comparison of deployment models, not a test of products.